🔗 Share this article

A number of Fortnite enthusiasts are feeling let down, and it's not due to the latest virtual happenings. Fortnite's newest limited-time event, which brings a Simpsons-themed map, also unveiled a fresh mechanic called pets. There's no ignore that these new pets are cute. However, the attached prices have left many fans shocked at the developer's efforts to monetize nearly each aspect of the gaming experience.

What Are Sidekicks?

Companions are essentially like Pokémon, but with some limitations. Players can give them a name, and they will accompany your character during a game. They are immortal, and you can interact with them. Other players not in the player's squad are unable to view these pets — and displaying one's animal friends is arguably half the enjoyment of owning them. Pets are able to be customized with outfits and emotes, however the debate revolves around their appearance. A sidekick's main appearance can only be altered one time, after which that choice is permanent. Players can choose a sidekick's coat color, secondary colors, iris tones, pattern, and its build size.

The Expensive Personalization Mechanism

Should a player later choose that you want their sidekick to appear a bit altered, it's not possible to just further customize its look. Players must purchase another sidekick. Furthermore, these pets aren't inexpensive. The majority of players are getting the Peels pet, because it is included with this season's reward track. According to leaks, future pets may be priced at from 1,000 to 1,500 V-Bucks; to put that in perspective, 1,000 V-Bucks is priced at $8.99 and 2,800 V-Bucks cost $22.99. However, players can change the name of a sidekick whenever you'd like.

Community Reaction and Comparisons

Most pets have not been officially launched yet, meaning the cost may easily change. Yet regardless of whether the company sets sidekicks more affordable, a lot of the anger comes from the fact that gamers might need to spend for a one kind of pet multiple times. For some, the cost structure feels particularly egregious considering the developer has already introduced pets that are carried about as part of back blings. Backpack companions do not have a restriction on changes and can be seen by fellow participants in the match. Backpack buddies can't be given a name or perform gestures, however other gamers can sometimes interact with them — which is more favorable than remaining invisible altogether.

The absence of unique features and restricted engagement choices have many players feeling disappointed. For instance, why is it not possible to a player, such as, interact playfully with their stylish banana dog? Some point out that sidekicks do not always stay close with the player if a match is moving quickly, or observe that Peels occupies two slots in the reward system — and this reinforces the idea that the company is squeezing players for money. Greedy is a term that's coming up frequently in such conversations, with some likening pet pricing to other aggressive pricing schemes in games like popular sports games. Additionally, it doesn't help that some sidekicks are expected to be more expensive than their outfit versions.

"PLEASE do not purchasing Sidekicks," pleads a highly-voted community thread that encourages other gamers to proverbially vote with their wallets.

"I know they're adorable," the thread adds, "we realize they're fun. We are aware everyone has been anticipating them. However the monetization focus being shown is unacceptable and should not be supported."

A Bigger Picture of Virtual Spending

In recent years, Fortnite's events and partnerships have grown in scale and ambition, yet the free-to-play title still needs to earn revenue. As such, the total number of items users can currently purchase has grown nearly excessive. In addition to basics like back blings, gliders, pickaxes, and emotes, players might potentially spend cash on footwear, music tracks, instruments, Lego pieces, cars, tires, vehicle drift colors, battle passes, and a subscription. Companion pets do not just cost money, and also bring in a host of new monetization options for the company. It is likely, players will before long be in a position to pay for items like pet looks, outfits, emotes, and further engagement options.

All of such cosmetics are entirely voluntary and unneeded to enjoy the game, yet gear can still affect your community interactions. Younger players, for example, at times encounter teasing for using flashy enough outfits. A comparable situation previously occurred when the developer introduced licensed kicks, which may be priced from 600 to 1,000 V-Bucks. The shoe cost model was not popular either, and some fans promised that they wouldn't fall prey to the temptation at the time. However ultimately, purchasing shoes became normalized. Now, sidekicks are additionally pushing the limits of how much a player might be willing to pay to be distinctive within the player base.

What's Ahead for Sidekicks?

Pets are still a fairly new addition, and they exist a title that changes frequently. Some fans are sharing that they've gotten a questionnaire that assesses how people think about sidekick mechanics and pricing, and this might possibly mean that the developer's plans are still fluid. Yet if the game footwear are a sign, companions probably won't get more affordable overall — instead, there may be a broader selection of costs to shop.

Ultimately, while certain individuals are expressing anger at the game shop prices, others are experiencing only happiness for their new battle royale friends.