🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand local authorities will be cut by over 50%, after a controversial legislative amendment that forced municipal councils to put the fate of hard-won Māori seats to a public vote.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which may have one or more elected officials depending on demographic data, were established in 2001 to give Māori electors the choice to elect a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, local governments could only create a Indigenous seat by first putting it to a public vote in their region. Communities often spent years building local support and pushing their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government permitted local councils to set up a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, saying local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated councils that had created a ward under the previous policy to conduct binding referendums concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to retain their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – revealing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

The results represented “a vital step in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the coalition government has implemented extensive reversals to measures intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has said it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Māori and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down city-country divisions – most cities required to vote backed Māori wards, while rural regions leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

This year’s local government elections recorded the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with less than a third of citizens casting a vote, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Councils are permitted to create different electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a community ballot. The different conditions applied to Māori wards suggested the government was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement concerned the 17 regions that chose to retain their wards.